Who could not love painting the magnificent naked ladies by Kev White?
That is, as soon as I can work out a suitable palette for so much bare flesh!
Now tracking THAT down can be fairly dangerous - "Honestly Honey. It's for research!!"
TheImp wrote:So what is tasteful? A coy posture? Nipslip? Bare tits? Bondage gear? Strapons? Implied bestiality? Actual bestiality?
Anything that is out of context, I don't mind the ?celtos mini that la posted, but I wouldn't buy it. It's crap like female assassins with their tits out or the kabuki marine women with tons of leg armour and a tiny tee which they are lifting up in order to distract the enemy?
I like to buy minis that look like they could be soldiers/fighters. I don't have any need for naked ladies...or men for that matter because I don't build dioramas or scenery. I have little need for civilians as well.
I would never buy an overtly sexualized miniature because they don't appeal to me and they are hardly a wargaming mini.
Fuck the prudes and all that bollocks.
Got no problem with any depravity represented in mini form (except for that boob guillotine thing and that's only because whilst my Witch Elves would no doubt relish it for prisoners, I happen to love and adore boobies and couldn't stand to see them cut off even in toy soldier form).
Having said that, I doubt I could be bothered to buy a mini purely because it had its norks out. It normally has to fit in with the greater scheme of things. (Eg: that really rather poor piece of 70's or 80's sculpting that serves as my sacrificial offering to everything from Cthulhu to Carrotox the evil cuntish dark lord of carrots.)