FW Rule changes and additions.

Forum dedicated to the frother committee's favourite wargame, Nick Lund's "Fantasy Warriors".

Moderator: FU!UK Committee

Postby area23 » Fri Apr 06, 2007 12:24 pm

Rev Nice wrote:that Irish company that do Prince August stuff (I think).


You mean Prince August?
If you don't believe in lead, you're already dead.
User avatar
area23
Associate Member
 
Posts: 841
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 3:14 pm
Location: Limbo

Postby Rev Nice » Fri Apr 06, 2007 3:37 pm

Nah, that's Prince August.

I meant Prince August.

Or maybe Prince August.

One of them, anyway.
Rev Nice
FU!UK Chair
 
Posts: 2416
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 12:07 am

Postby Doc » Sat Apr 07, 2007 10:24 pm

Duff wrote:It would be nice to get a real consensus on the rules for any future events/get togethers.


Its a lovely dream. ;)
User avatar
Doc
Site Admin
 
Posts: 651
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2003 2:24 am
Location: London

Postby area23 » Sat Apr 07, 2007 10:27 pm

Doc wrote:
Duff wrote:It would be nice to get a real consensus on the rules for any future events/get togethers.


Its a lovely dream. ;)


Maybe a point for the sixth international frothers congress.
If you don't believe in lead, you're already dead.
User avatar
area23
Associate Member
 
Posts: 841
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 3:14 pm
Location: Limbo

Postby Dave Leigh » Tue Aug 21, 2007 12:29 pm

Priest Rolls...Priest it!

I think that priest rolls should only be allowed a limited number during battles.

When we played the game at Salute this year it definately slowed the games down.

After numerous dice rolls and several consulting of charts you score a hit and someone shouts "Priest it!" the priest roll suceeds...all well and good except that all that dice rolling was for nothing.

Maybe half a dozen Preist rolls allowed per battle?
Image"Jeg sag Amon Amarth at Download! De vugget! Vikingene lever pa!"
User avatar
Dave Leigh
 
Posts: 1299
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 7:09 pm
Location: On a Longship!

Postby custode » Thu Aug 23, 2007 2:14 pm

Hello to all.
I wanted to ask which used list army, those of Nick Lund? Or you have written of your lists army?
Thanks.
Matteo.
custode
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 1:41 pm
Location: Italy

Re: FW Rule changes and additions.

Postby Forim Oakenshite » Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:48 pm

Duff wrote:The Kick in the Bollocks Rule.
Any player can call this rule if s/he thinks another player is cheating, power gaming with the rules (Hero at the front of a single file of Berserkers etc) or just generally ?Acting the Cunt?. If found to be justified, the accused player must modify their gaming style/tactics or receive the ?Kick to the Bollocks?. If the accuser is in fact found to be the one being a ?Twat? then they run the risk of receiving the ?Kick? instead. As a general rule anything that smacks of Rules Lawyering counts as ?Acting the Cunt?.

Please feel free to throw in your tuppence worth, just don't expect me to care. :D


:rofl:
User avatar
Forim Oakenshite
 

Postby cantf**kinlogin » Mon Dec 17, 2012 4:36 pm

Don't you think Priest rolls unbalance the game somewhat?
User avatar
cantf**kinlogin
 

Previous

Return to Fantasy Warriors Zone

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests