The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Here you can discuss anything froth related that does not fit into another forum, or indeed any nonsense that should enter your head.

Moderator: FU!UK Committee

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby frotherPest » Sun Mar 07, 2021 1:55 am

It would depend on the advertiser.

But I’m thinking it is safe to say most of Bill’s advertisers are interested in hits and exposure, they already know that quality left.
Nobody ever reads the fine print.
User avatar
frotherPest
 
Posts: 1434
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:42 pm

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby BastardSonOfDereksSpreadsheet » Sun Mar 07, 2021 3:09 am

frotherPest wrote:Bill’s advertisers are interested in hits and exposure.


Exposure these days is only the same 7,000 unique visitors each day, give or take 5%.

Hits these days are a little harder to pin down. Up to mid September 2020 it was very consistently 140,000 each day, give or take 10%.

After mid September 2020, the total hits each day began varying wildly from just below 130,000 to over 200,000 on any given day; with no discernible correlation to forum activity (Blue Fez excluded).

N.B. During Tango01's spells in the "Dawghouse" hits per day did not fall...they went up, unique visitor numbers did not.

Conclusion: If you pay a dozen transpinay's to work randomly at computers, you may not get the complete works of Shakespeare but you can probably grift the advertising budget of enough miniatures companies to keep TMP going.
User avatar
BastardSonOfDereksSpreadsheet
 

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby kyotebue2 » Sun Mar 07, 2021 3:29 am

Huh. That sounds Trumpian grift.
kyotebue2
 
Posts: 7558
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 7:31 pm
Location: The Oklahoma Dust Bowl.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby BastardSonOfDereksSpreadsheet » Sun Mar 07, 2021 3:59 am

kyotebue2 wrote:Huh. That sounds Trumpian grift.


Data courtesy of mining TMP's own statistics pages (probably soon to be disabled/deleted, if Bill can work out how :lol: ).
User avatar
BastardSonOfDereksSpreadsheet
 

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby kyotebue2 » Sun Mar 07, 2021 5:04 am

Quick Bill hide the evidence !!!!!
kyotebue2
 
Posts: 7558
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 7:31 pm
Location: The Oklahoma Dust Bowl.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby CHIPS » Sun Mar 07, 2021 3:17 pm

kyotebue2 wrote:Quick Bill hide the evidence !!!!!

Let the kiddies out of the basement too!!!
User avatar
CHIPS
 

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby CHIPS » Sun Mar 07, 2021 3:25 pm

Voice From Limbo wrote:I wonder if Bill realizes that at least some of these are likely to be women:

http://theminiaturespage.com/plus/msg.mv?id=167450

The inclusion of real women is to satisfy what the normal man wants to see.
Tuck and roll only looks good in automotive upholstery. You can paint them up anyway you want, they just aint' they real thing. Kind of like recasts.
User avatar
CHIPS
 

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby Macunaima » Sun Mar 07, 2021 5:34 pm

I have seen PLENTY of great looking recasts in my life. A couple, when painted up, passed inspection by GW employees at cons in the 1990s.

It would be amusing to take you for a stroll along Copacabana, CHIPS, and have you point out to me which sex workers you think “are the real thing” and which aren’t.

Also, “normal man”? I think we can say with confidence that almost no wargamers fit into that category, however conceived.
Macunaima
 
Posts: 6470
Joined: Sun May 18, 2014 1:54 pm

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby Il Segaiolo Pedantesco » Sun Mar 07, 2021 5:56 pm

Thank goodness I'm a collector... :roll:
*SVM MALLEVS CVNNORVM*

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose...
- Alphonse Karr
User avatar
Il Segaiolo Pedantesco
 
Posts: 4040
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 5:16 pm

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby Guest » Sun Mar 07, 2021 7:00 pm

Il Segaiolo Pedantesco wrote:Thank goodness I'm a fat, uptight, queen who no one fancies any more... :roll:


FTFY
User avatar
Guest
 

PreviousNext

Return to The Froth Pot

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bollocks to Brexit, Google [Bot] and 27 guests