The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Here you can discuss anything froth related that does not fit into another forum, or indeed any nonsense that should enter your head.

Moderator: FU!UK Committee

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby Il Segaiolo Pedantesco » Fri Nov 27, 2020 6:07 pm

Picador wrote:
Macunaima wrote:
Picador wrote:
Macunaima wrote:Oh. While I can’t delete it now. Besides, this is a well known and celebrated work of art! It’s been on FB numerous times.


Facebook censors tits, so I think you might be telling porkies.


Nope. Definitely saw it on facebook. However, that was years ago and FB has gotten much more strict about its content control since then.

It’s on Youtube, The Guardian, Huffpo, Cosmopolitan.... Let’s just say it’s a bonafide Work of Art (tm), much like Venus de Milo (which, to be fair, Facebook recently censored , IIRC).


Courbet's L'origine du monde is a bona fide work of art (it's in the Musee d'Orsay), it still wouldn't last long on FB. It breaks the rule here too.

Mac knew not to post that pic, but he believes he's above the rules...
*SVM MALLEVS CVNNORVM*

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose...
- Alphonse Karr
User avatar
Il Segaiolo Pedantesco
 
Posts: 3940
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 5:16 pm

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby Guest » Fri Nov 27, 2020 6:34 pm

Macunaima wrote:It’s on Youtube, The Guardian, Huffpo, Cosmopolitan.... Let’s just say it’s a bonafide Work of Art (tm), much like Venus de Milo (which, to be fair, Facebook recently censored , IIRC).

Courbet's L'origine du monde is a bona fide work of art (it's in the Musee d'Orsay), it still wouldn't last long on FB. It breaks the rule here too.


Hell, we are like dogs returning to eat our own vomit here - we discussed 'Origine du Monde' years ago, I remember it well.

Courbet's is a loverly work of art, I agree, but it's also quite definitely a cunt, and not allowed here. If Wargames Illustrated did a 'make your own Cunt' article, that wouldn't change that Mac. Plus, your 'tile of minges' isn't really in the same league anyway.
User avatar
Guest
 

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby Picador » Fri Nov 27, 2020 6:43 pm

Guest wrote:
Macunaima wrote:It’s on Youtube, The Guardian, Huffpo, Cosmopolitan.... Let’s just say it’s a bonafide Work of Art (tm), much like Venus de Milo (which, to be fair, Facebook recently censored , IIRC).

Courbet's L'origine du monde is a bona fide work of art (it's in the Musee d'Orsay), it still wouldn't last long on FB. It breaks the rule here too.


Hell, we are like dogs returning to eat our own vomit here - we discussed 'Origine du Monde' years ago, I remember it well.

Courbet's is a loverly work of art, I agree, but it's also quite definitely a cunt, and not allowed here. If Wargames Illustrated did a 'make your own Cunt' article, that wouldn't change that Mac. Plus, your 'tile of minges' isn't really in the same league anyway.


Mac didn't post anything about Courbet, that was me. So congratulations on remaking the point I was making.

Do try to keep up.
Stone Mountain's OK with IP theft, so Bill deleted his thread to protect him from looking a cunt.

http://theminiaturespage.com/boards/msg ... ?id=521602
Picador
 
Posts: 1059
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2019 9:28 am

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby frotherPest » Fri Nov 27, 2020 7:56 pm

Is anyone going to complain?
Is there a single moderator that would remove it?
Is the host site going to know?
Nobody ever reads the fine print.
User avatar
frotherPest
 
Posts: 1382
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:42 pm

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby A Yes Man » Fri Nov 27, 2020 8:04 pm

frotherPest wrote:Is anyone going to complain?
Is there a single moderator that would remove it?
Is the host site going to know?


No (to all three)
User avatar
A Yes Man
 

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby Macunaima » Fri Nov 27, 2020 10:30 pm

I’d remove it if I could. Sorry. And no, I did not imagine that posting a picture of a work of art that’s been shown damned near everywhere would be a violation of the rules. Again, sorry.

I really hope none of you poor lads are going to hell now because of my mistake. :|
Macunaima
 
Posts: 6375
Joined: Sun May 18, 2014 1:54 pm

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby Macunaima » Fri Nov 27, 2020 10:34 pm

Oh, and by the way....

Image

(Duly censored to protect Bill’s delicate sensibilities. I imagine vulvas gross him out.)
Macunaima
 
Posts: 6375
Joined: Sun May 18, 2014 1:54 pm

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby kyotebue2 » Fri Nov 27, 2020 10:40 pm

Vulvas are fine by me.
kyotebue2
 
Posts: 7480
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 7:31 pm
Location: The Oklahoma Dust Bowl.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby McKinstry » Sat Nov 28, 2020 4:49 am

Vulvas are fine by me.


Just as a matter of personal sensibilities, I find a series of vaginal pictures sincerely less distasteful than a still capture of Rudy Giuliani oozing while incompetently trying to subvert an election. I certainly do not blame anyone posting the picture but rather Rudy existing as the organic bipedal embodiment of moronic evil.
McKinstry
 
Posts: 763
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2016 1:51 am

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby Picador » Sat Nov 28, 2020 11:09 am

McKinstry wrote:
Vulvas are fine by me.


Just as a matter of personal sensibilities, I find a series of vaginal pictures sincerely less distasteful than a still capture of Rudy Giuliani oozing while incompetently trying to subvert an election. I certainly do not blame anyone posting the picture but rather Rudy existing as the organic bipedal embodiment of moronic evil.



As it goes, kyote's correct. Anatomically they're vulvas not vaginas.

Like Mac, they're still cunts though :)
Stone Mountain's OK with IP theft, so Bill deleted his thread to protect him from looking a cunt.

http://theminiaturespage.com/boards/msg ... ?id=521602
Picador
 
Posts: 1059
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2019 9:28 am

PreviousNext

Return to The Froth Pot

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests