Page 1 of 3

Overtly Sexual Miniatures

PostPosted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 11:21 pm
by TheImp
Just curious about the general consensus on the subject.

PostPosted: Sat Oct 29, 2011 11:22 pm
by TheImp
I lost my Col Marbles is a Tosser option. Just consider it the default, if you've got no other answer. :loopy:

PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 12:08 am
by Rob
We've had everything from the sea side postcard to the paedophile, the erotic to the ridiculous on here. And it looks to me it all sells.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 12:10 am
by freakinacage
I'm remarkably prudish. Got no problem with the most twisted of pornography but minis should be toy soldiers imo. That said, I don't mind the large scale pinups from andrea or is it pegaso?

PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 12:11 am
by TheImp
Rob wrote:We've had everything from the sea side postcard to the paedophile, the erotic to the ridiculous on here. And it looks to me it all sells.

Don't forget furries. We've had plenty of furries. :loopy:

PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 12:15 am
by TheImp
freakinacage wrote:I'm remarkably prudish. Got no problem with the most twisted of pornography but minis should be toy soldiers imo. That said, I don't mind the large scale pinups from andrea or is it pegaso?

Both. There's a dozen or so companies that specialize in the nudie girl models. Most of them only go as far as pinup, but I've seen some fairly explicit bondage themed stuff too. Can't recall who makes it though.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 12:19 am
by ALizardInCrimson
I pretty much have no strong opinion of sexualized female minis.
sometime they annoy me. but they sell.

I get reeeealy sick of them and would love some male pin-up minis to balance it all out.

either way they are a small % of what I paint

PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 12:22 am
by TheImp
So what is tasteful? A coy posture? Nipslip? Bare tits? Bondage gear? Strapons? Implied bestiality? Actual bestiality?

PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 1:49 am
by Goldwyrm
TheImp wrote:Just curious about the general consensus on the subject.


Consensus? There is none. It's an absurd navel gazing debate and should be a poll on TMP.

PostPosted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 2:00 am
by Wargames Factory Funboy
I don't care.
If they're functional ( as in a diorama, Cetic/Barbarian Naked Fanatics or Classic Slaaneshi army ) then why not, but I'd rather paint up a nice armed model then something with boobies.
But hey, I get laid once in a while and it don't even cost me money ( not especially for the "laid" part, that is, her monthly upkeep takes that into account, next to the cooking, the cleaning and the merry company :wink: )