Blade a Runner 2049

Discussion of cinematic genius and disaster past and present, with a twist of froth.

Moderator: FU!UK Committee

Re: Blade a Runner 2049

Postby Hew Johns » Wed Dec 13, 2017 4:45 pm

TBH I haven't looked at the numbers. Just haven't heard any buzz since and the reviews on IMDB after a deluge of paid hype was pretty negative. The original Bladerunner is well known as a film whose reputation built long after the initial tepid reception.
Hey -- there's plenty of time for Klinsmann to figure out who's our best player..............................................And cut him.
Hew Johns
Posts: 487
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 3:50 am

Re: Blade a Runner 2049

Postby sane max nli » Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:24 am

Hew Johns wrote: a film whose reputation built long after the initial tepid reception.

tepid is not the word. the movie-going world officially rated it 'a stinker'

I am very fond of the original. I was exposed to it in a 'you will like this, and that's the rules' sort of way, because my drama teachers remembered Tony and Ridley Scott for some reason or other as local lads made good and I remember being impressed but not liking it that much. Later, it was one of the few movies we had on tape, so I watched it to death, and liked it. But a lot of the reason I ike it now is its powerful nostalgia feeling.

The sequel has made good numbers, and is well regarded still. Most SF would love to do that well.
User avatar
sane max nli


Return to Movie Zone

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest