Is this really site feedback? Jesus.
redzed wrote:ddeputy & UnclEvl who actually 'own' FUUK are a pair of cunts,. don't believe me?
In fairness they've never denied it.
pair of vain egotistical little twats.
Hold on, just turning down the gain on the ironymeter.
redzed wrote:What's the matter? someone say something you pair of losers don't like so you start locking topics?
why can't you just fuckoff and let the people who actually love Frothers run it?
Any issues with the site are their fault, they only keep hold of the reigns so they can get into Salute free & early.
Was there a particular contribution you wanted to make to the thread? It probably shouldn't be locked and almost certainly shouldn't have been posted publicly in the first place, but maybe its best when several moderators are having a punch up that they have a little cool down time. If we were the Illumninated Order you seem to suggest it would have all been swept away quietly - point of fact is that the Rev could unlock it now if he wanted to.
Point of fact number two, anyone can get into Salute free and early if they put the effort in to run a participation game there.
I really struggle to see where your apparent anger comes from, do you just seek out authority figures and rail against them even when they a) aren't really authority figures in any real sense and b) don't give a shit? Do you just get louder and louder until someone pays you some attention? If the people who currently manage this site were to fuck off would you (or anyone else who stepped up) hit the magic formula of making everyone happy at the same time? How much of the time you currently devote to impotent rage and general cuntyness would you
be prepared to divert into satisfying mutually exclusive demands or complaints that, when examined, are entirely inarticulate and unactionable?
Yes there are a number of occasions where a final decision comes down to what the committee (comprising the people who originally built the site and those who have contributed so much to the site since its inception that they have been asked to join) want to see, but there is generally an attempt to reflect feedback from members. Why would that be a controversial principle?
redzed wrote:These same scum cuntmittee members were also directly responsible for the shit new forum, they gathered together in their little murderous girlie clique and sprung it on the other members. There was no discussion it was a few 'hob nobby posh boys' who decided what the 'plebs' at Frothers will have, and their attitude is if you don't like it you can jolly well fuckoff.
It remains an option if you are really that unhappy about the banner. BTW do you mind if we use this last paragraph in the FAQs?