Mr Moonshine wrote:
Personally, I'd suggest going to the source documents rather than getting the spin from some dodgy ideologically partisan website.
a) Snopes isn't partisan.
b) The source is wikileaks. Who make shit up.
c) Wikileaks' source is "unnamed source at the state department".
So how exactly do we go to the source? Or is taking Assange's word for it as good as we're going to get in that regard?
And if the answer to that is "look, there's a piece of paper with some typing on it that says it's from the state department!" then I'd like to introduce exhibit B, a back of an envelope with "Trump said he wants to sell the US to China while he was eating kittens for breakfast." Which must make that true, eh?