Page 6898 of 7563

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 8:11 am
by blah number5
Condottiero wrote: he just re-regurgitates Vegetius and some other writers, just to hype his own cred, while besmirching condottieri.


besmirching condottieri is a wise starting position though.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 8:56 am
by sebigboss79nli
Condottiero wrote:
sebigboss79 wrote:
Condottiero wrote:Name a PAVN general who routed US forces.


Which part of routing them is required to win the war (or a battle)? Correct, NONE whatsoever.
However, if running was not required why call it "Operation Frequent Wind" 0;)

Not going to answer the question are you? Show me another example of Dien Bien Phu...



Changing the question does not alter the result. The Yanks lost, the French at least forced a decisive battle while the yanke ran with the tail between their legs

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 9:53 am
by Macnamara
How do you account for US failure in Vietnam then, Condi?
And try doing it without blaming the media.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 11:11 am
by JJCH Domino Theories
Well he could always blame Tricky Dick. :lol:

Official TNP response is:

1) The meejuh (Vietnam was pre-FOX so no librul prefix required).
2) Peaceniks, hippies and pinkos.
3) A Democrat controlled House under Ford.
4) Jane Fonda.
5) Drugs.
6) An international cabal consisting of Jewish bankers and Queen Liz.
7) Hollywood (see 5&6)
8) John Kerry and Abby Hoffman.
9) Commies don’t fight fair.
10) Fluoride.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 11:16 am
by General Paranoia
Well it looks like triggering Condi is officially more fun than taking the piss out of TNP.
And the best bit is he keeps coming back for more 8)
Well done everyone!

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 11:20 am
by Picador
General Paranoia wrote:Well it looks like triggering Condi is officially more fun than taking the piss out off TNP.
And the best bit is he keeps coming back for more 8)
Well done everyone!



He bites like an angry terrier. Every time.

It must exhaust the poor fucker :)

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 11:29 am
by General Paranoia
Picador wrote:
General Paranoia wrote:Well it looks like triggering Condi is officially more fun than taking the piss out off TNP.
And the best bit is he keeps coming back for more 8)
Well done everyone!



He bites like an angry terrier. Every time.

It must exhaust the poor fucker :)


I love the way his only form of argument to people pointing out where US strategy failed runs along the lines of "Well [insert poster's country] sucks so there!" :lol:

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 2:46 pm
by Guest2
blah number5 wrote:
Condottiero wrote: he just re-regurgitates Vegetius and some other writers, just to hype his own cred, while besmirching condottieri.


besmirching condottieri is a wise starting position though.



Condom besmirches himself every time he posts.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 3:02 pm
by Jane Fonda
Yeah. It was all my fault.
But I’d do it again.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 3:21 pm
by Macunaima nlinn
Well, I actually agree with Condi in part. The NLF/NVA wanted to win battles like Dien Bien Phu against the U.S. and couldn’t. Thus by their own metric, they lost tactically.

But it was by a cunt’s hair in some cases.

Furthermore, in terms of STRATEGY, they were spot on. They knew that all they had to do was to bleed the U.S. indefinitely and they’d eventually win. The U.S. knew this too, and from the beginning.

Given that tactics should follow strategy, the NLF/NVA did a pretty damned good job. They didn’t make their prime goal (another Dien Bien Phu) but they did a damned good job of consistently making their secondary goals (grab onto the American’s belt and make them bleed) and that was enough to win. More than enough.

And the U.S. knew that BEFORE they got sucked into Vietnam. Four presidents did all they could to lie to the public about that salient fact.

So Condi’s real problem is that he seems to think battles are clearly won or lost according to the rules, of, say, football. The NLF/NVA did indeed largely dictate when and where fights would take place and, although they had their fantasizing moments, too (i.e. Tet will push the Yanks into the sea), they by and large had a competent strategy, stuck to it, and made their tactics serve it.

Both the Yanks and NVA/NLF sucked at operations, however, and that is one reason why the war dragged on so long.

By the way, Condi, if you want to talk “revisionist history”, let’s talk the late 1990s revision of Tet into a clear cut allied victory.