The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Here you can discuss anything froth related that does not fit into another forum, or indeed any nonsense that should enter your head.

Moderator: FU!UK Committee

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby kyotebue2 » Sun May 26, 2019 3:30 am

I still think von Shwarts is a Frothers sockpuppet. Oh oops!!!!
kyotebue2
 
Posts: 5706
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 7:31 pm
Location: The Oklahoma Dust Bowl.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby JJCH nli » Sun May 26, 2019 3:43 am

kyotebue2 wrote:I'm surprised no one has realized he is taking the piss.


Good man! Frothers is doing you a power of good, you’re even picking up colloquialisms from the civilised world. Keep that up and we’ll stop thinking of you as a seppo.
User avatar
JJCH nli
 

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby SOB Van Owen » Sun May 26, 2019 5:16 am

kyotebue2 wrote:I still think von Shwarts is a Frothers sockpuppet. Oh oops!!!!

You cunts are the ones who blew MY cover.
I’d still be there if you hadn’t “speculated”.
So fuck of.
Harrumph.
:D

Hey Bill. We know you never come here, but just once blow your cover. Was it these clowns here who tipped you off?

Send me the password for William Pitt the Eldar please, if you would be so kind. Probably last seen or heard from in .... 2007?
User avatar
SOB Van Owen
 

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby Winnie » Sun May 26, 2019 5:19 am

Did I use “Rhomphaia Raskolnikov” on TMP or Slobbovia?
User avatar
Winnie
 

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby JJCH nli » Sun May 26, 2019 6:48 am

No it was Layzee-Boy Ladyboy and I think Bill objected to the resemblance. :D
User avatar
JJCH nli
 

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby Derek H » Sun May 26, 2019 12:41 pm

Von Schwartz is not the sharpest tool in the box. That, or he's playing a subtle game with a sock.
Image
http://theminiaturespage.com/boards/msg.mv?id=507969
Pimping my blog at http://dereksweetoys.com/
User avatar
Derek H
 
Posts: 2073
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 10:01 am

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby General Paranoia » Sun May 26, 2019 12:45 pm

Derek H wrote:Von Schwartz is not the sharpest tool in the box. That, or he's playing a subtle game with a sock.
Image
http://theminiaturespage.com/boards/msg.mv?id=507969

He's obviously playing dumb so as not to stand out.
He just needs to suggest a "buckshot or hollow points for home invasion" poll for a free membership
Editor in Chief Bill wrote:It also 'thins the herd' so to speak, so that marginal and under-financed companies fall off the radar, leaving the better managed companies to dominate the news sphere.
TMP - killing off small companies!
User avatar
General Paranoia
 
Posts: 9602
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2003 11:13 am
Location: Helping Bill make the right choices

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby Brechtel198 » Sun May 26, 2019 2:46 pm

It took long enough to wind this up.
http://theminiaturespage.com/boards/msg ... 851&page=2
I can’t do it all myself. I need liars and slanderers of Napoleon to show up and cooperate.
User avatar
Brechtel198
 

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby Napoleon was a Loser » Sun May 26, 2019 5:53 pm

So Kiley really thinks that only the premature blowing of the Lindenau bridge turned Leipzig into a defeat!

This is also quite funny:

"That contest occurred on 16 October without Napoleon decisively defeating the allies in that sector. On Marmont's front on 16 October, he defeated all of the allied attacks against him."

'without Napoleon decisively defeating the allies in that sector' = with Napoleon failing to achieve his objectives; that tends to be know as "being defeated".

'On Marmont's front on 16 October, he defeated all of the allied attacks against him' = the French were pushed back and, most importantly, were prevented from carrying out Napoleon's order to march to his support on the southern front.

Kiley just cannot admit that his hero was defeated.
User avatar
Napoleon was a Loser
 

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Postby Bronshtein » Sun May 26, 2019 8:28 pm

He's only following Elting's lead.

Elting's big take on Waterloo was that 'the hard core of practically every regiment held together' and 'the French had lost only two eagles, and those early in the battle to English cavalry. (By contrast they had taken either four or six colors...from Wellington's army.)'

See - it was win on points!
and... 'The strategic situation was excellent...'
It was all the politicians fault in Paris - they surrendered, the bastards, stabbed in the back!

For Napoleon read Westmoreland and the for the Imperial Guard the USMC and Wellington was Võ Nguyên Giáp.
User avatar
Bronshtein
 
Posts: 7266
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2012 11:53 am
Location: The Promised Land

PreviousNext

Return to The Froth Pot

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: GarrisonMiniatures and 39 guests