The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :froth: :loopy: :| :mrgreen: :demonic: 0:) 0;) :argue: :wry:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Condottiero » Sat Dec 07, 2019 2:55 am

Picador wrote:
Condottiero wrote:
Derek H wrote:
Condottiero wrote:Unlike Derek, I'm not triggered...


You really are a complete and utter wanker Condi.

When you can't refute something, especially since you're a lying prick, you resort to insults.


Write fucking English Mr Pot.

Learn to read Mr. Kettle!

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Condottiero » Sat Dec 07, 2019 2:54 am

General Paranoia wrote:
Condottiero wrote:
Picador wrote:So, you admit the Septics lost?

:)

And learn how to nest quotes properly, you useless Yank

Derek was the one who messed up the nest quotes and you're having issues too, but don't worry, I fixed it for you. Doesn't surprise me, as you Slimeys are known for half-arsed measures: from parts of Africa all the way to South-East Asia, people are still dealing with your messes.


Is this the point where you start pushing the helicopters off the aircraft carrier's deck?

At least we have an aircraft carrier and something to push off it! :wry:

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Condottiero » Sat Dec 07, 2019 2:37 am

sebigboss79 wrote:
Condottiero wrote:
Nerds all of you wrote:Hearing yanks quibble about "AKSHUALLY WE NEVER LOST TACTICALLY" is like reading Nazi officers proudly proclaim how they won a glorious victory and destroyed 50 Amerikaner/Bolshevik tanks for only 2 losses, only each diary entry is 30 miles closer to Berlin and in the end, they're shocked how it got that way.

Never said the US armed forces lost tactically, but the NVA and VC never won a battle, in the style battles in recorded history.


James William Gibson-Technowar

The VC/NLF/OpFor pretty much decided when, where and how long to engage the US Forces. Not sure but I suppose that means they owned them pretty much on the tactical level.

Revisionist bullshit based on cherry-picked instances...

VC personnel were no more versed in surviving in the jungle than US troops, especially if it was a recruit forcibly sent in from the North - in their own words! The Australians were better at it than either group.

Was it General Doi's plan to attrit his force to almost a battalion at Firebase Ripcord?
sebigboss79 wrote:"The VC did not roll into Saigon as long as the US was there in force". Why would they unless the above tactical situation is favourable to them? You haven't read much Sun Tsu, have you?

I said PAVN, there were hardly any VC post TET and the North Vietnamese government preferred it that way.

Sun Tsu?!? Weak trolling. You think the average NVA commander was well versed in Sun Tzu and knowing when to take advantage of a favorable situation? North Vietnamese divisions tried rolling in several times, but were repelled experiencing heavy losses and the last time involving US air power and South Vietnamese ground forces and they were surprised at the progress made in 1975. PAVN generals were no more gifted than US ones!

This is the kind of borderline racist bullshit apology for how East Asians fight - the East isn't inscrutable! Reminds me of proponents of Anatoly Timofeevich Fomenko's New Chronology: discredited by Russian historians, yet found new life in the post Cold War West.

There's plenty of bullshit from the US side, like stabbed in the back notions, but there's an equal amount of revisionist bullshit from Hanoi, yet certain people by into the latter's spin, simply due to their personal biases.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by kyotebue2 » Sat Dec 07, 2019 2:26 am

I remember seeing that.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by General Paranoia » Sat Dec 07, 2019 2:08 am

Condottiero wrote:
Picador wrote:So, you admit the Septics lost?

:)

And learn how to nest quotes properly, you useless Yank

Derek was the one who messed up the nest quotes and you're having issues too, but don't worry, I fixed it for you. Doesn't surprise me, as you Slimeys are known for half-arsed measures: from parts of Africa all the way to South-East Asia, people are still dealing with your messes.


Is this the point where you start pushing the helicopters off the aircraft carrier's deck?

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Picador » Sat Dec 07, 2019 1:52 am

Condottiero wrote:
Derek H wrote:
Condottiero wrote:Unlike Derek, I'm not triggered...


You really are a complete and utter wanker Condi.

When you can't refute something, especially since you're a lying prick, you resort to insults.


Write fucking English Mr Pot.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Condottiero » Sat Dec 07, 2019 1:49 am

Derek H wrote:
Condottiero wrote:Unlike Derek, I'm not triggered...


You really are a complete and utter wanker Condi.

When you can't refute something, especially since you're a lying Johnson, you resort to insults.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Condottiero » Sat Dec 07, 2019 1:47 am

Picador wrote:So, you admit the Septics lost?

:)

And learn how to nest quotes properly, you useless Yank

Derek was the one who messed up the nest quotes and you're having issues too, but don't worry, I fixed it for you. Doesn't surprise me, as you Slimeys are known for half-arsed measures: from parts of Africa all the way to South-East Asia, people are still dealing with your messes.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Derek H » Sat Dec 07, 2019 1:47 am

General Paranoia wrote:
Derek H wrote:
Condottiero wrote:Unlike Derek, I'm not triggered...


You really are a complete and utter wanker Condi.


You said that like it was some kind of revelation!


Just a statement of the obvious.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by sebigboss79 » Sat Dec 07, 2019 12:20 am

Condottiero wrote:
Nerds all of you wrote:Hearing yanks quibble about "AKSHUALLY WE NEVER LOST TACTICALLY" is like reading Nazi officers proudly proclaim how they won a glorious victory and destroyed 50 Amerikaner/Bolshevik tanks for only 2 losses, only each diary entry is 30 miles closer to Berlin and in the end, they're shocked how it got that way.

Never said the US armed forces lost tactically, but the NVA and VC never won a battle, in the style battles in recorded history.


James William Gibson-Technowar

The VC/NLF/OpFor pretty much decided when, where and how long to engage the US Forces. Not sure but I suppose that means they owned them pretty much on the tactical level.

"The VC did not roll into Saigon as long as the US was there in force". Why would they unless the above tactical situation is favourable to them? You haven't read much Sun Tsu, have you?

Top