The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :froth: :loopy: :| :mrgreen: :demonic: 0:) 0;) :argue: :wry:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Macunaima » Wed Nov 25, 2020 3:19 am

Happy to see you guys giving Rich’s game some love on LAF, btw. Nice to see someone put there money where their mouth is, even if it’s only a few quid. He’s now over fifty percent with a bit more than a week to go. BEG is a good company and I hope he makes it.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by frotherPest » Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:40 am

Only Mac thinks that anyone is going to bother using sock accounts in a forum that allows guest posting.

Jesus, you make Ralph look analytical.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Macunaima » Tue Nov 24, 2020 11:16 pm

Well, that or one or two guys with a lot of socks and a grudge.

Meanwhile, on TNP, Von Schwartz turns the good news of a gaming space opening in Detroit into a stealth screed against Michigan’s Democrat Governor and the Great Covid Conspiracy. Maybe if Bill spent less time trolling me here, he could get on editing some of that politics in his “no politics” gaming page?

http://theminiaturespage.com/boards/msg.mv?id=541408

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Hew Johns » Tue Nov 24, 2020 9:20 pm

It's takes a special kind of poster to stink up the Froth Pot...

Can we please get back to why Kiley is such an ass?

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Macunaima » Tue Nov 24, 2020 8:21 pm

Why are you whinging anyway, Bill? You’d never even have let “poor Rich” post on TMP because he’s not an advertiser.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Guest » Tue Nov 24, 2020 6:37 pm

Macunaima wrote:An all too predictable self-justification.


Image

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Macunaima » Tue Nov 24, 2020 6:13 pm

Bill wrote:
Macunaima wrote:Bronie, why does me giving an honest and critical opinion — constructive criticism, to boot — about some dude’s kickstarter...


Bullshit, Mac.
You're just gaslighting the real issue. This is not about you giving your (unasked) critique of his product. This is about you being an obnoxious cunt and thinking of only your own self-righteous opinion.


I gave an honest opinion on Rich’s work when he made a public call for donations. I told him how I thought he could improve it.

Tell me Bill, what part of that is “self-righteous”?

Let’s be real clear here. Rich isn’t just showing us a figure he painted: he is using TWW, LAF, and other forums to advertise for a money-making project he’s organized. Telling him why one won’t support that project in plain, honest language isn’t at all the same thing as pissing all over someone’s creative genius or destroying a product line they have already launched.

As Michael says, there are plenty of figs out there that don’t float my boat and I usually don’t talk about them. In the case of a failing kickstarter, however, I feel no ethical obligation to keep my opinion to myself. To the contrary: I feel that at least now Rich may have an inkling as to WHY his kickstarter is not working out — at least for someone like me who is salivating for a good 1/700 fantasy naval game.

Your mileage obviously varies, Bill, as does Michael’s, and that’s fine. But you’re just being your usual dramatic, disruptive, and destructive self with your winging about how I somehow “ran Rich off of TWW”.

Get a grip and edit your own site. You banned me there not for being disruptive or for being a cunt, but for daring to stand up to a self-proclaimed anti-semite and sociopath on your restricted “politics” board. A man you later apparently banned for claiming that COVID 19 doesn’t exist and/or was part of a Jewish/Commie conspiracy.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Macunaima » Tue Nov 24, 2020 6:09 pm

frotherPest wrote:Didn’t this conversation go more like:

“Hey, I’ve designed these and plan on selling them.”

Mac: “These are so bad I wouldn’t buy them. I never buy anything, I just recast. But if I did buy things then I wouldn’t buy these.”

Poor guy got run off by someone who was never going to be a customer anyway, no matter how bad or nice his sculpts were.


Nope. It went like this.

Rich: “I am passing the hat around to make these figures, if anyone wants to give me money.”

Mac: “The figures are highly derivative and, worse, look like toy boats. I do not like them. Here are some RL examples which may give you better ideas. There are plenty of unemployed sculptors who could help. Good luck with your project, but I won’t be supporting it.”

The guy didn’t get “run off”: he left in a huff because someone gave an honest critical and constructive opinion on a gaming site.

Again, I notice that no one has even bothered to respond to him on DakkaDakkaDakka or LAF, but luckily Rich seems to have gotten word that his post fell off the front page of the latter site, so he’s now repeated himself and passed the hat ‘round again, god bless him.

I hope he makes his kickstarter quota, I really do. And I hope you’re helping him out with that, Priest, because he’s such a “poor guy” and you’re so adamant about the raw deal he got for having to listen to an honest opinion.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Ssanemax » Tue Nov 24, 2020 3:22 pm

Picador wrote:Stop. Being. A. Fucking. Wanker.


He. Can't.

I start to think He wrote Jeremy Corbyn's recent apology too.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Picador » Tue Nov 24, 2020 2:55 pm

Macunaima wrote:
Bronshtein wrote:Not about the Kickstarter.
About not putting Mike in a difficult position.


Bronie, why does me giving an honest and critical opinion — constructive criticism, to boot — about some dude’s kickstarter put Mike in a difficult position? The only possible way that could happen is that said dude with the kickstarter believes that no one should be allowed to publicly criticize his pet project and that Mike should suffer for that.

That’s not me putting Mike in a difficult position: it’s said dude with a kickstarter trying to force public opinion to go his way by coercing an editor.


Stop. Being. A. Fucking. Wanker.

You were wrong. You can't admit it. If I were Mike I'd ban you until you wrote a full and grovelling apology for being a fucking wanker. Because that would hurt you wouldn't it, Mr Neverwrong?

I can see why you've pissed off the deathsquads...

Top