The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :froth: :loopy: :| :mrgreen: :demonic: 0:) 0;) :argue: :wry:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Il Segaiolo Pedantesco » Sun Mar 07, 2021 7:34 pm

Guest wrote:
Il Segaiolo Pedantesco wrote:Thank goodness I'm a fat, uptight, queen who no one fancies any more... :roll:


FTFY

Patman, how about looking in the mirror?

I'm ~ 5'7" and around 68 KG...

Despite being a prima donna, I have plenty of fanciers, but I don't care!

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Guest » Sun Mar 07, 2021 7:00 pm

Il Segaiolo Pedantesco wrote:Thank goodness I'm a fat, uptight, queen who no one fancies any more... :roll:


FTFY

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Il Segaiolo Pedantesco » Sun Mar 07, 2021 5:56 pm

Thank goodness I'm a collector... :roll:

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Macunaima » Sun Mar 07, 2021 5:34 pm

I have seen PLENTY of great looking recasts in my life. A couple, when painted up, passed inspection by GW employees at cons in the 1990s.

It would be amusing to take you for a stroll along Copacabana, CHIPS, and have you point out to me which sex workers you think “are the real thing” and which aren’t.

Also, “normal man”? I think we can say with confidence that almost no wargamers fit into that category, however conceived.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by CHIPS » Sun Mar 07, 2021 3:25 pm

Voice From Limbo wrote:I wonder if Bill realizes that at least some of these are likely to be women:

http://theminiaturespage.com/plus/msg.mv?id=167450

The inclusion of real women is to satisfy what the normal man wants to see.
Tuck and roll only looks good in automotive upholstery. You can paint them up anyway you want, they just aint' they real thing. Kind of like recasts.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by CHIPS » Sun Mar 07, 2021 3:17 pm

kyotebue2 wrote:Quick Bill hide the evidence !!!!!

Let the kiddies out of the basement too!!!

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by kyotebue2 » Sun Mar 07, 2021 5:04 am

Quick Bill hide the evidence !!!!!

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by BastardSonOfDereksSpreadsheet » Sun Mar 07, 2021 3:59 am

kyotebue2 wrote:Huh. That sounds Trumpian grift.


Data courtesy of mining TMP's own statistics pages (probably soon to be disabled/deleted, if Bill can work out how :lol: ).

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by kyotebue2 » Sun Mar 07, 2021 3:29 am

Huh. That sounds Trumpian grift.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by BastardSonOfDereksSpreadsheet » Sun Mar 07, 2021 3:09 am

frotherPest wrote:Bill’s advertisers are interested in hits and exposure.


Exposure these days is only the same 7,000 unique visitors each day, give or take 5%.

Hits these days are a little harder to pin down. Up to mid September 2020 it was very consistently 140,000 each day, give or take 10%.

After mid September 2020, the total hits each day began varying wildly from just below 130,000 to over 200,000 on any given day; with no discernible correlation to forum activity (Blue Fez excluded).

N.B. During Tango01's spells in the "Dawghouse" hits per day did not fall...they went up, unique visitor numbers did not.

Conclusion: If you pay a dozen transpinay's to work randomly at computers, you may not get the complete works of Shakespeare but you can probably grift the advertising budget of enough miniatures companies to keep TMP going.

Top