Frothers Unite! UK

Picador wrote:No, that was an insult. Obviously one that was too subtle for you.

Do you suffer from some sort of learning disability, or are you perhaps American?

Picador wrote:

Guest wrote:

Derek H wrote:A lot of copyright issues on the internet have not yet been fully resolved in court. Small companies or individuals regularly get bought off by the big boys in out of court settlements if they think they could lose a case. And I'm told by people who should know that they will sometimes pay a lot of money to avoid unfavourable case law becoming established.

Any stats from your spreadsheet* to support that, Derek?

*I also noticed that on that TMP thread about Tango that someone there quipped about you and your spreadsheets. Your twattishness is going international!

Whereas your monotonous cuntishness is truly universal Bill

Bronshtein wrote:The lawyer's comment might fry the remaining brain cells of the TNP party who remain convinced that internet publication = public domain.

Guest wrote:

Derek H wrote:A lot of copyright issues on the internet have not yet been fully resolved in court. Small companies or individuals regularly get bought off by the big boys in out of court settlements if they think they could lose a case. And I'm told by people who should know that they will sometimes pay a lot of money to avoid unfavourable case law becoming established.

Any stats from your spreadsheet* to support that, Derek?

*I also noticed that on that TMP thread about Tango that someone there quipped about you and your spreadsheets. Your twattishness is going international!

Derek H wrote:A lot of copyright issues on the internet have not yet been fully resolved in court. Small companies or individuals regularly get bought off by the big boys in out of court settlements if they think they could lose a case. And I'm told by people who should know that they will sometimes pay a lot of money to avoid unfavourable case law becoming established.