by Khusrau » Sat Nov 28, 2020 12:28 pm
Picador wrote:Macunaima wrote:Picador wrote:Macunaima wrote:Oh. While I can’t delete it now. Besides, this is a well known and celebrated work of art! It’s been on FB numerous times.
Facebook censors tits, so I think you might be telling porkies.
Nope. Definitely saw it on facebook. However, that was years ago and FB has gotten much more strict about its content control since then.
It’s on Youtube, The Guardian, Huffpo, Cosmopolitan.... Let’s just say it’s a bonafide Work of Art (tm), much like Venus de Milo (which, to be fair, Facebook recently censored , IIRC).
Courbet's L'origine du monde is a bona fide work of art (it's in the Musee d'Orsay), it still wouldn't last long on FB. It breaks the rule here too.
Don't even start on Egon Schiele. Although there is a distinction between a photograph of a vagina and a photograph of a painting.
[quote="Picador"][quote="Macunaima"][quote="Picador"][quote="Macunaima"]Oh. While I can’t delete it now. Besides, this is a well known and celebrated work of art! It’s been on FB numerous times.[/quote]
Facebook censors tits, so I think you might be telling porkies.[/quote]
Nope. Definitely saw it on facebook. However, that was years ago and FB has gotten much more strict about its content control since then.
It’s on Youtube, The Guardian, Huffpo, Cosmopolitan.... Let’s just say it’s a bonafide Work of Art (tm), much like Venus de Milo (which, to be fair, Facebook recently censored , IIRC).[/quote]
Courbet's L'origine du monde is a bona fide work of art (it's in the Musee d'Orsay), it still wouldn't last long on FB. It breaks the rule here too.[/quote]
Don't even start on Egon Schiele. Although there is a distinction between a photograph of a vagina and a photograph of a painting.
