Frothers Unite! UK

Bronshtein wrote:It's those tricky technical legal points that confuse the DM reader.
You know - justice, innocent until proven guilty, fair trial, the right to legal representation, being judged by your peers not some power crazed Minister.
Political correctness gone mad.

Yeah, but they are British rights for British people and she does not look like a British person to them.

It's those tricky technical legal points that confuse the DM reader.
You know - justice, innocent until proven guilty, fair trial, the right to legal representation, being judged by your peers not some power crazed Minister.
Political correctness gone mad.

From the DM website:

"Tory MP Andrew Bridgen was left furious by today's ruling saying it risked a flood of jihadis returning. He told MailOnline: 'It opens the door for all her fellow jihadi brides to return to Britain - and potentially their terrorist partners too. Most Brits will rightly think that when you swear allegiance to another country that declares war on Britain, that you have given up all the rights and protections and privileges of your British citizenship. After today's ruling it appears you have not'.

Is his argument that IS was a country that formally declared war on the UK? If so, sorry but he is wrong.

The DM comments section is fabulous; I really liked this one:

"The law must be changed to allow removal of citizenship from terror suspects."

Note the word "suspects".

Bronshtein wrote:So May was talking bollocks, as was Sajid Javid - who knew?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-53427197

Judiciary 1 Patel 0

Thank fuck for the rule of law.

Let's hope the evil cunt Patel's appeal fails as well.

At least Begum should have the right to plead her case.

god, the Daily Mail must be WISHING they could blame 'Euro-Judges' for this. Perhaps they will blame it on the Labout Party

standard daily mail response when this all kicked off 'why should we pay for her to be shipped over 'ere and housed at out expense in cushy jail? Eh? Its Shania Law gone maaaaad'

reasoned response - because it turns out to be a lot cheaper than the cost to the poor ol taxpayer than letting her citizenship appeal work its way through our courts.

So May was talking bollocks, as was Sajid Javid - who knew?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-53427197

Judiciary 1 Patel 0

Thank fuck for the rule of law.

Let's hope the evil cunt Patel's appeal fails as well.

At least Begum should have the right to plead her case.

More Tory "humanitarian" values on display.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/ ... SApp_Other

Apparently lacking in empathy wrote:Lol. So convince me why you're right? But no, you'd rather throw insults and no doubt claim it's above my intelligence or a waste of your time.

Question for you. Do you agree that the world is overpopulated? Second question, do you have kids?

First part - you have no intention of listening to any other point of view, and trying to convince you is a waste of time. You throw plenty of insults around yourself so that one is just you being a prick.

Second part - what does any of that have to do with any of this? Nothing, that’s what.

Ah, just fuck off and believe whatever you want, you fucking wanker. Passive-aggressive cunts like you are frankly just a waste of time.

Randoms just random.

Apparently lacking in empathy wrote:Question for you. Do you agree that the world is overpopulated? Second question, do you have kids?

Yes and no and we are thinking of adopting.

As for you, if you’re so convinced about your opinions, why not post them under your real name or a recognized handle?

Peace, love, and kittens,

Thaddeus

Lol. So convince me why you're right? But no, you'd rather throw insults and no doubt claim it's above my intelligence or a waste of your time.

Question for you. Do you agree that the world is overpopulated? Second question, do you have kids?