The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) :( :o :shock: :? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :froth: :loopy: :| :mrgreen: :demonic: 0:) 0;) :argue: :wry:
View more smilies
BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON
Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Macunaima » Tue Oct 27, 2020 1:53 pm

frotherPest wrote:The same people that wanted to wage war on an entire religion over 3000 American dead are now excusing and contributing to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans.


That’s about it, yes.

I DID notice there wasn’t much “nevar forgit” rhetoric emanating from Republican donut holes this last eleventh of September.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by frotherPest » Tue Oct 27, 2020 5:41 am

The same people that wanted to wage war on an entire religion over 3000 American dead are now excusing and contributing to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Guest » Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:21 pm

Hew Johns wrote:Bill Gates calls Scott Atlas an off-the-rails pseudo-expert. https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/bill-gates-slams-trump-covid-adviser-scott-atlas-143302816.html Better ban him, Bill!

Winnie called him a moron, and he got 5 days.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Voice From Limbo » Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:22 pm

Maybe he was thinking of this.

https://youtu.be/VamFXyCbarw

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Il Segaiolo Pedantesco » Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:41 pm

Picador wrote:Chad is confused. Or thick. Or both.

http://theminiaturespage.com/boards/msg ... 328&page=3


CGI in '79?!?

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

He'd have been better off suggesting Harryhausen stop motion or LotR style rotoscoping from '78... :roll:

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Hew Johns » Mon Oct 26, 2020 5:28 pm

Bill Gates calls Scott Atlas an off-the-rails pseudo-expert. https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/bill-gates-slams-trump-covid-adviser-scott-atlas-143302816.html Better ban him, Bill!

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Picador » Mon Oct 26, 2020 5:27 pm

Chad is confused. Or thick. Or both.

http://theminiaturespage.com/boards/msg ... 328&page=3

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Ssanemax » Mon Oct 26, 2020 4:19 pm

Is it just me, or is TMP down all day so far?

Two Possibilities - Bronie's Brutal Censors have struck it down for being insufficiently Nazi, or else Bill has wanked himself unconscious and fallen face-down into the server stack.

Bet!

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Bronshtein » Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:37 am

Guest wrote:False analogy on your part. If I didn't like beans and stood in the foyer of Tesco and Sainsburys, shouting out and waving placards and being abusive to other shoppers who bought beans then...well, I may still be pissed off if they banned me, but I could hardly blame them.

They were banned for not liking beans, not making a nuisance to other users/shoppers.
However before we torture the analogy further, lets move onto...
Bronshtein wrote:Yeah, sure, and everyone can grow up to the Queen.


Another false analogy. Starting your own website is not like dreaming of becoming Queen. You could have it done in 5 minutes if you wanted. It truly is open to everyone. And it really is as simple as that.

Well, that wasn't an analogy, that was a piss take.

And it really isn't that simple. A website is not a the search engine that drives c70% of the net, or a social media platform that dominates the news awareness of a significant portion of the world. I can build a website which no-one would find with a few quid for the domain name. Building a system that would give me a chance of competing with Facebook, possibly a little more and I would be blocked, or bought out if I became even a moderate threat.

Bronshtein wrote:Okay maybe you can let the US Govt know not to bother with its antitrust suit against Google.


More totalitarian governments than the US have tried stopping the internet and information exchange. No one seems to have managed it yet.

I'm glad you think no-one suppresses access to information or preferences one side of an argument on the internet.

Re: The Sad Cunts with No Life Thread

Post by Guest » Sun Oct 25, 2020 5:39 am

Bronshtein wrote:Perhaps but if I ran Tesco and Sainsburys and I refused to serve you food because you didn't like beans, you'd be a tad pissed off. Especially is the nearest Lidl was forty miles away.


False analogy on your part. If I didn't like beans and stood in the foyer of Tesco and Sainsburys, shouting out and waving placards and being abusive to other shoppers who bought beans then...well, I may still be pissed off if they banned me, but I could hardly blame them. And, in the case of having to shop elsewhere, starting my own website with my own views is not the same as having to drive 40 miles to Lidl. Which brings me to...

Bronshtein wrote:Yeah, sure, and everyone can grow up to the Queen.


Another false analogy. Starting your own website is not like dreaming of becoming Queen. You could have it done in 5 minutes if you wanted. It truly is open to everyone. And it really is as simple as that.

Bronshtein wrote:Okay maybe you can let the US Govt know not to bother with its antitrust suit against Google.


More totalitarian governments than the US have tried stopping the internet and information exchange. No one seems to have managed it yet.

Bronshtein wrote:My dear chap, if only it were, we could exchange letters in The Times over this.


Strangely, I'd rather like that. Whatever happened to the *person of no specific gender* of letters?

Top